U.S. President Joe Biden is unlikely to make a decision before the Nov. 5 presidential election on blocking Nippon Steel Corp.’s plan to acquire United States Steel Corp., The Washington Post reported Friday.
The report came after the daily and other outlets said last week that the White House was set to take action to stymie the deal. The controversial takeover plan has drawn opposition from Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, as well as former President Donald Trump, her Republican rival in the race.
Quoting unnamed sources, the daily reported that following “vocal opposition” to blocking the deal, White House officials have indicated that “such a decision is unlikely in the short term and may not be made” until after the presidential election.
File photo taken on Sept. 2, 2024, shows U.S. Steel’s Edgar Thomson Plant near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Kyodo)
Advertisement
Biden remains opposed to the takeover, but “the pace of internal deliberations has slowed,” the report said.
Nippon Steel, the world’s fourth-largest producer, and U.S. Steel, the 24th-largest, announced the $14.1 billion acquisition deal in December. U.S. Steel and its shareholders are in favor of the deal, which would make it more competitive globally.
But the powerful United Steelworkers union is strongly opposed to the deal.
Nippon Steel has sought to allay concerns, announcing that the majority of board members and core senior management of U.S. Steel would be U.S. citizens and its headquarters would remain in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a key battleground in the presidential race.
U.S. Steel President and CEO David Burritt said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal earlier this month that should the deal fall through, the company may close its mill in Pennsylvania and relocate its head office.
Advertisement
Nippon Steel Vice President Takahiro Mori and members of the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment met this week as the U.S. government discussed with Japanese government and business officials the potential negative consequences of the deal being blocked.
The Japanese steelmaker said Friday it had sent a letter to Biden, signed by Nippon Steel Chairman and CEO Eiji Hashimoto and U.S. Steel’s Burritt, on the acquisition plan, apparently in the hope of gaining the president’s support.
People wait on the New York gubernatorial race to be called at an election night party for Gov. Kathy Hochul in New York City on November 8, 2022. Alex Kent/Getty Images/FileCNN —
A hollowed-out state party apparatus. An off-kilter campaign by the governor. A botched redistricting plan that squeezed out incumbent House members.
New York Democrats offered a wide array of excuses for their disastrous 2022 midterms, when Republicans flipped four seats outside New York City on their way to winning a narrow US House majority.
Advertisement
Now, less than two months out from the 2024 general election, the state party, its campaign season allies, chastened candidates and Gov. Kathy Hochul are betting on what most describe as a revitalized political project – a series of them, in fact – to help the state deliver Democratic majority-makers, particularly from suburban districts, to the House next year.
Former President Donald Trump’s Wednesday rally on Long Island, in Republican Rep. Anthony D’Esposito’s district, underscores the high stakes of the New York contests. D’Esposito is one of five New York GOP freshmen facing an onslaught from Democrats determined to claw back suburban voters. In 2022, he defeated Democrat Laura Gillen, flipping a district where Joe Biden would have routed Trump in 2020 under the current lines. Gillen is back for a rematch this year.
Reps. Marc Molinaro and Mike Lawler in the Hudson Valley, Nick LaLota on Long Island and Brandon Williams in Central New York are the other Republicans facing tough reelection fights in what is still largely blue state that Kamala Harris is expected to win comfortably.
“New York is the reason Democrats lost the House in 2022,” said Pamela Shifman, president of the Democracy Alliance, a liberal group spending big in New York this year. “And it’s going to be the reason we win it back in 2024.”
She is not alone in that analysis. In August, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi singled out New York when asked about the party’s lost majority at a Politico/CNN event at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
Pressed to explain, Pelosi said, “I think it related to the gubernatorial race.”
Advertisement
The brief but cutting remark ratcheted up the pressure on Hochul and, by extension, state party chair Jay Jacobs, the duo who have shouldered the brunt of the blame for 2022 in Democratic circles in New York and across the country. The governor has insisted that new investments and increased coordination among party leaders and the liberal grassroots will prevent a repeat in November or beyond.
“We have changed this political party. We have turned it into the strength and the power that it always should have been,” Hochul told New York delegates at the Democratic convention.
Members of the New York delegation hold pictures of Hochul during the ceremonial roll call vote at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 20, 2024. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images/File
Democratic operatives in New York are largely divided on whether Hochul and her allies are doing enough and in the most efficient manner. But the effort is clear: For the first time in recent history, the party and its allies appear more interested in electing their own candidates in the general election than in engaging in internecine primaries.
“I give them credit for being organized up and down the ballot,” said Ana María Archila, co-director of the state’s Working Families Party, which is part of the coordinated effort and no stranger to the intraparty fights of the past.
Archila said the “threat of a Trump presidency and a Trumpist Congress” has been an animating factor in the effort to coordinate across the different groups. While a Trump presidency would be a defeat, she pointed out that securing a majority in the House would pave the way for Brooklyn’s own Hakeem Jeffries to be elected speaker.
Advertisement
Getting coordinated
The new coordinated campaign has brought the state party and Hochul’s operation together with those of Jeffries, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and New York’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, who is up for reelection this year.
Former Jeffries campaign manager Lizzy Weiss is the coordinated campaign director for the state party.
The coordinated committee says it has nearly 40 offices spread out over swing districts across the state, dozens of staffers and more than 10,000 volunteers phone-banking and canvassing for Democratic candidates. Hochul has raised more than $22 million ahead of her next campaign in 2026, with $5.5 million going to the state party and $3 million to the coordinated campaign.
Outside groups, many of them frustrated by years of infighting among officials like former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, have also stepped up their spending and fieldwork.
A Jeffries-blessed group called Battleground NY, an amalgamation of labor unions and progressive outfits such as Indivisible and the state Working Families Party, has been on the ground for nearly a year. It did extensive canvassing for Democrat Tom Suozzi during his February special election victory to succeed the since-indicted Republican George Santos in a Long Island seat.
Advertisement
“We didn’t really see a robust coordinated operation in 2022 until the last few weeks,” Battleground NY strategist Gabby Seay told CNN. “We believe that you have to talk to voters early.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries holds his weekly news conference at the US Capitol Visitor Center in Washington, DC, on September 12, 2024. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Democratic sources familiar with Jeffries’ involvement said he is determined to avoid the embarrassment of 2022.
“Jeffries is completely focused on New York because he has to be,” one of the sources said. “He’s been fundraising, doing campaign stops, strategizing, meeting with all the relevant entities, having regular phone calls with the delegation to strategize, connecting them with donors – he is doing it all.”
Suozzi’s success earlier this year, Seay said, underscored the importance of closer engagement with voters. While Republicans focused on immigration, crime and the conflict in Gaza, Suozzi and the Democrats – without shying away from those issues – hammered the GOP over provincial concerns such as the state and local tax, or SALT, deduction, which was capped by Trump and the Republicans in their 2017 tax law.
Trump, in a social media post Tuesday, wrote he would work with Democrats to “get SALT back” – a remarkable claim given his role in curtailing it but another indication of the issue’s potency in the New York suburbs.
Advertisement
An expensive job to finish
House Majority PAC, the super PAC linked to Jeffries announced in February the creation of the New York Fund – setting aside a total of $45 million for Empire State races.
The fund got a recent boost from former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who donated $10 million in July. In the weeks leading up to Election Day, the bulk of the spending is going toward paid media, including TV, digital and radio ads and direct mail, boosting Democratic challengers in one of the most expensive media markets in the nation.
A New York-based Democratic strategist, who is not working on any of the congressional campaigns, told CNN that Hochul’s absence from the ticket this year should also bolster the party’s House candidates.
Hochul speaks at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 19, 2024. Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters/File
“One big difference is the congressional races are being run by New York people, unlike the governor’s race (in 2022), which had people from out of state running a campaign in New York,” said the strategist, who also expressed some sympathy for Hochul, saying that the governor “understands” the task better now than two years ago, when she headed the ticket for the first time, following Cuomo’s August 2021 resignation.
“She was thrown into it – baptism by fire,” the strategist said. “(There was) no coalition, and the state party was not galvanized.”
Advertisement
The biggest test for Democrats will likely come in the 17th Congressional District, north of New York City in the state’s Hudson Valley.
Lawler, the Republican incumbent who could run for governor in 2026, unseated Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, the leader of House Democrats’ campaign arm, two years ago and he faces Democratic former Rep. Mondaire Jones this fall.
Advertisement
Lawler has sought to keep Trump at arm’s length in a district the former president would have lost by 10 points in 2020. The congressman has reaffirmed his support for Trump while forgoing his divisive rhetoric. Last week, Lawler joined more than two dozen House members in a bipartisan “unity commitment” to respect the results of the 2024 presidential election.
“In our country, we hash out our ideas at the ballot box and then come together to govern once all votes are counted,” Lawler said in a statement, directly appealing to the Democrats he will need to win reelection.
In a potential blow to Democrats, Jones will not be on the Working Families Party ballot line this fall after breaking with New York progressives during the primary – a slip-up that could split the anti-GOP vote in November.
Another potential hurdle facing Democrats in battleground districts stems from an effort by state party lawmakers to make hay on the backlash against the US Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Abortion rights are broadly popular across party lines in red and blue states. Heading into this campaign, New York Democrats set out to juice turnout across the state – to their advantage, given the party’s sizable voter registration edge – by adding a measure that would protect reproductive rights to the ballot.
But the New York Equal Rights Amendment has increasingly become a source of frustration for Democrats hoping to win back suburban swing voters. The amendment, which does not actually use the term “abortion,” has been weaponized by some Republicans, who criticize its sweeping language and added protections for “gender identity” and “gender expression.”
Advertisement
“There has been no greater attack on women’s rights and girls’ rights in the State of New York throughout any of our lifetimes than Proposition 1 in November,” former Rep. Lee Zeldin, who narrowly lost to Hochul in the 2022 governor’s race, said this spring, when he appeared alongside former college swimmer Riley Gaines, a high-profile opponent of transgender athletes participating in women’s sports.
Democrats are now grumbling about both the construction of the amendment and the lack of cash for the campaign organized to promote it. The promise last year of $20 million in funding has largely fallen by the wayside. The current figure is closer to $3 million, though there is chatter of a later spending surge from party leaders.
Another Democratic strategist with deep ties in New York told CNN that, for all the handwringing over 2022 and some squabbles over who might deserve credit if the party rebounds this year, the reality is as uncertain as the broader, chaotic political climate.
“There’s more focus than there was the last couple cycles, both from the state party, but also obviously the national committees,” the strategist said. “Now, whether that translates or not, I think, is still an open question.”
CORRECTION: This story has been updated to reflect the correct location of the 2024 Democratic National Convention.
President Joe Biden has denounced election-season attacks on the Haitian American community in the United States, calling out Republican leaders for fear-mongering.
Speaking on Friday at a White House brunch billed as a “celebration of Black excellence”, Biden warned that Haitian Americans were a “community that’s under attack in our country right now”.
His remarks were a rebuke to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and his vice presidential pick JD Vance, both of whom have spread unfounded rumours about Haitian migrants and asylum seekers in the US.
“It’s simply wrong. There’s no place in America” for that kind of rhetoric, Biden said, without naming Trump directly.
“This has to stop, what he’s doing. This has to stop.”
Advertisement
Trump — a former Republican president — and Vance, a senator from Ohio, have campaigned on a largely anti-immigrant platform, stirring fears of mass migration and crime at rallies across the US.
Presidential debates matter in American politics. And the one that takes place on Tuesday night between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris – their only currently scheduled face-off – may matter more than most.
Joe Biden’s poor performance in the first presidential debate in late June created a firestorm of pressure within the Democratic Party that ultimately forced him to abandon his re-election campaign.
Advertisement
Even though Kamala Harris has been vice-president for more than three years and a candidate for president for seven weeks, she is still a relative unknown for many Americans. In a recent New York Times survey, 28% of likely November voters said that they needed to know more about the Californian.
That poll showed the race a statistical dead heat – a finding most recent surveys have also indicated, both nationally and in key battleground states. The 2024 presidential campaign has been full of historic tumult, but the American electorate is still sharply – and narrowly – divided.
That underscores the importance of Tuesday night’s debate, where even small shifts in the mood of the electorate could be the difference between victory and defeat for the candidates.
For Ms Harris, the showdown in Philadelphia provides an opportunity for her to flesh out the details before an audience of tens of millions – although she will have to do so while under rhetorical fire from her Republican opponent.
Advertisement
This opportunity is not without risks, however, as Ms Harris could define herself – and her positions – in ways that damage her electoral prospects. She has struggled in the past with answering pointed questions under pressure, and her reluctance to sit for media interviews in the opening weeks of her campaign has denied her the opportunity to hone her linguistic chops.
Although she has tried to present herself as the change candidate in this election, the moderators – and the former president – are likely to press her to defend the Biden administration’s record, particularly on areas where polls show Democrats are weak, such as border security and inflation.
She will also have to explain why she has renounced some of the more liberal policies she embraced during her unsuccessful bid for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. She recently has walked back her positions on a fracking ban, decriminalising border crossing and nationalising health insurance, among others.
She has explained these changes as ones made to reflect new circumstances – but they may be viewed by some voters as moves born of political expediency.
For Trump, the debate presents an opportunity to wrest back the initiative in this campaign after a month where the Democrats – with their new nominee and high-energy convention – dominated political headlines. He has a history of thriving in the spotlight and setting the terms of political conversation that keeps his opponents off-balance and his issues – notably on immigration and trade, where his positions have broad popular support – at the forefront of political discussion.
The former president has his own potential pitfalls on Tuesday, however. His uneven performance during his June debate with Mr Biden drew little scrutiny because of his opponent’s sometimes catastrophic verbal miscues. Ms Harris is sure to present a more nimble opponent, and his answers will have to be sharper.
Advertisement
During a New York economic forum last week, he was unable to offer a clear explanation for his childcare policies. Such verbal meandering during the debate will provide Democrats with a wealth of campaign fodder.
Trump must also tread carefully when sparring with the vice-president – only the second woman presidential nominee and the first of colour. If he comes across as domineering or belittling, he could further damage his already weak support among female voters.
The two candidates have used markedly different ways of preparing for Tuesday night’s event. The vice-president – and former prosecutor – has been in Pittsburgh, a few hours drive east of Philadelphia, holding mock debates and reviewing her policy proposals. The move also allowed her to campaign and benefit from some local media coverage in the largest and most crucial battleground state of Pennyslvania.
Trump – who has participated in presidential debates in each of the past three elections – has held more informal sessions, including reviewing his positions on key issues. Last week, he participated in a town hall forum hosted by conservative cable network Fox News.
Advertisement
Tuesday, then, is set to be a contrast of styles as well as political views.
Although election day won’t arrive until November, early voting is set to begin this month in some key battleground states – including in pivotal Pennsylvania.
So while this debate could help set the political environment for the last two months of the 2024 presidential race, it also will be the last chance for the two candidates to reach some voters in states where every ballot matters.